The VAT is BAD

There have been many facts, fiction, analyses and opinions circulating on the possibility of a European-style value-added tax (VAT) becoming a reality in the United States.  Several online articles describe the VAT, how it works and the pros and cons.  (See Wilkipedia, European Taxation and Customs Union, and of course,  NCPA’s commentary and an additional editorial from the Wall Street Journal, to name a few). 

The VAT is collected at every stage of the production of a good and also paid by the consumer who purchases the final good.  Proponents of a VAT argue that it since it is a tax on consumption (akin to a national sales tax), it does not discourage work, as do the marginal income tax rates on labor.  Furthermore, they claim it requires less compliance paperwork than the income tax or a traditional sales tax.  Even though the tax is collected and paid to the government at every stage of production, those who purchase products for resale to consumers will receive credit  for most VAT paid.

But the devil is in the details.  On top of the already convoluted paperwork involving the current income tax system, a VAT system will require manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers to calculate and keep track of taxes paid in order to receive credit, which involves – you guessed it - paperwork, time and administrative costs.  Small businesses will be hit especially hard, as evidenced by various website articles from the United Kingdom instructing small businesses on how the VAT works.  (Read one such article from the U.K.’s Small Business Entrepreneurs website).

So who else will get the short end of the stick besides small business?  Consumers, of course.  They will still pay the full VAT on retail goods purchased, regardless of the length of the production chain.  Since nothing happens in a vacuum, a VAT would have distortionary effects on both the supply of and demand for goods.   At the risk of sounding like a simpleton, a 15 percent VAT on  goods will add at least 15 percent to the cost of  goods, possibly more if businesses pass additional administrative costs on to the consumer.

Unless the law of supply and demand has drastically changed since I was in college,  when the price of a good increases, the demand for that good falls.  Our economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending - consumption of goods comprises more than two-thirds of gross domestic product – so what will happen to the economy?

And don’t be misled by the notion that  ”a simple VAT could eventually replace the income tax system.”  There is too much revenue in both for government to give up one for the other.  Europe has not abandoned their high marginal income tax rates in favor of  the VAT…why would we?

The bottom line is the VAT, especially implemented in the current tax system, will kill economic growth.

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Brian W. says:

    Great post, Pam.

    In Washington the saying goes: “Democrats are against the VAT because it is too regressive and Republicans are against the VAT because it raises limitless amounts of revenue. But once Democrats find out how much revenue the VAT raises, and once Republicans find out how regressive it is, it will pass.”

  2. Joe says:

    There will also be a lot of evasion of this tax. A recent study from Boston U. School of Law reports significant VAT fraud, especially cash transactions, through the use of Zappers, programs used with electronic cash registers: ‘Sweden, for example, has a cash-intensive economy, one of the world’s highest VAT rates (25%), and also reports that 70% of the ECRs in the country are either “… constructed for manipulation or have had software installed that allow sales to be manipulated (Zappers)…” ‘

    ‘Tax losses in the EU can be estimated at approximately $23 billion per year in the restaurant sector alone. Germany tops the list followed by the UK, France, Italy and then Spain.’
    See http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1559886

  3. Rafael Gomes says:

    Great post. Instead of focusing on a VAT (or even on a text-book consumption tax without sales tax exemptions), government should also re-evaluate the current subsidies given to the crop industry and other sectors. I wonder if eliminating those (unjustified) subsidies would create substantial revenue.

  4. Gabriel says:

    kindly let me know berlfiy about GST and inform me about the tax structure of GST. I also wish to know whether we should pay tax to COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT OR CENTRAL EXCISE.

Leave a Reply



If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.